PeeringDB Product Committee
- Purpose is to study and recommend feature needs.
- Interested in volunteering? Contact email@example.com.
Product Committee Charter
Approved by Board July 7th, 2017
The PeeringDB Product Committee (PC) is charged with steering the future product development and running the market outreach efforts to continuously improve the value that PeeringDB delivers to the networks registered with PeeringDB, and the broader community.
Out of Scope
- The PC does not drive PeeringDB improvements related to the administrative interfaces & functions used by the PeeringDB Admin Committee.
- The PC does not consider PeeringDB improvements related to the server, storage, hosting or network infrastructure.
- Gather inputs from stakeholders regarding the evolution of PeeringDB in terms of product features and overall long term objectives.
- Formulate the long term objectives and validate them with the PeeringDB Board and the members of the PeeringDB Governance mailing list.
- Document and maintain workflow process to handle requests and issues.
- Maintain the product roadmap and feature request backlog and makes them publicly accessible.
- Create and maintain PeeringDB product documentation and presentation materials.
- Develop market outreach and evangelisation to increase the uptake of PeeringDB use and improve data quality.
- Propose new features or enhancements based on the long term objectives and validates significant product evolutions with key stakeholders.
The PC shall work with other PeeringDB committees to ensure an equitable division of development resources in recognition of the volunteer efforts that are ensuring the daily operations.
The PeeringDB Product Committee members serve a 2 years renewable term, potential volunteers may submit their candidacy to the PeeringDB Board. The product committee will select their own Chair and Vice chair by simple majority vote. The Board may add or remove members at any time it deems necessary.
- Questions and suggestions for the Product Committee can be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org
- Key development communication and community input gathering efforts will be conducted via the PeeringDB Governance Mailinglist email@example.com
- All issues and the product roadmap and feature backlog can be found at https://github.com/peeringdb/peeringdb/issues
Product Committee members will decide by simple majority vote on contested issues called by the Product Committee Chair.
All members of the Product Committee take part in a Hot Seat schedule with a weekly rotation in order to monitor incoming github issues and ensure the follow-up of existing issues until they are either closed as non-implemented or moved to the backlog.
New Issues are evaluated to confirm that they are valid and coherent with the product vision, which may require asking the reporter for feedback. Issues that cannot be reproduced or where the solution is unclear are moved to Review. While in Review issues are discussed by the community and the Product Committee until a solution is determined.
Simple issues that do not require much discussion or have an obvious solution move directly to Backlog. Once in Backlog the issue can be returned to Review or Decide if necessary. The issue can also be marked as
If the issue is considered not to be coherent with the product vision, it will be marked as
wontfix; the requester always has the option to forward their issue to the PeeringDB board if they disagree with the assessment by the Product Committee.
The product committee makes the final decision on how each issue is handled. If there are multiple ways to solve an issue it moves to Decide and the Product Committee then votes on the way to handle the issue. When the vote has been made the issue is moved to Backlog.
If an issue is labeled as a bug, the severity will determine how it will be resolved. P1/P2 bugs are considered service impacting and will be treated by the software vendor under the maintenance agreement, P3/P4 bugs will be treated as product enhancement requests.
Depending on the effort required to implement the issue, development will be done either on project basis or as part of the maintenance agreement. The Product Committee follows a budget release process to fund project based development efforts. Developments that fall within the budget envelope allocated to the Product Committee require no further approval by the board, however 75% of the Product Committee members must agree.
Sprint is the column that is next in the pipeline, encompassing everything that is approved to work on, so development starts immediately and it is moved to In Progress by the developer. This would be decided by the Product Committee.
Every member of the Product Committee may label one issue a month as PC Candidate. An issues labeled as PC Candidate must have a solution for development fully specified within the Github issue before it can be considered for implementation. Once it is agreed with the developer that no more information is needed to be able to fix/implement an issue, it can be proposed for inclusion in the next sprint to the Product Committee mailing-list. The Product Committee (Vice) Chair will move the agreed upon issues to the Sprint column.
All other PeeringDB projects also go through this issue board to decide on priority. For example, when something for peeringdb-py goes into a sprint, an issue will be made on the peeringdb-py project and accessed by the main board.
Done means the issue is completed in development and will be pushed to beta for review. Issues are not Closed until they are deployed to beta.
- March 21st, 2017: Meeting Notes
- April 13th, 2017: Meeting Notes
- June 1st, 2017: Meeting Notes
- July 6th, 2017: Meeting Notes
- August 3rd, 2017: Meeting Notes
- October 12th, 2017: Meeting Notes
- December 7th, 2017: Meeting Notes
- January 4th, 2018: Meeting Notes
- March 14th, 2018: Meeting Notes
- April 5th, 2018: Meeting Notes
- June 7th, 2018: Meeting Notes
- July 5th, 2018: Meeting Notes
- September 6th, 2018: Meeting Notes
- October, 4th, 2018: Meeting Notes
- Novermber 1st, 2018: Meeting Notes
- December 6th, 2018: Meeting Notes
- Eric Loos (Chair)
- Matt Griswold (Vice Chair)
- Samer Abdel-Hafez
- Florian Hibler
- Aaron Hughes
- Martin J. Levy
- Stephen McManus
- Arnold Nipper
- Chris Phillips
- Job Snijders
Product Marketing and Community Outreach (non-voting member)
- Greg Hankins